All the little twists in the case of Mirna Salihin's murder are intriguing enough to speculate over, so Ice Cold is definitely a true-crime case worth revisiting. The problem is in how the documentary indulges sensationalist arguments and pure speculation with the same level of urgency as it does with expert counsel. A large part of the film has to do with how this trial started to become such a fixture in Indonesian public life, but it feels as if the movie would rather provoke even more baseless conspiracies through its gossipy tone than provide smarter analysis. There's an appeal to how simple this case is relative to other true-crime stories, but this shouldn't be an excuse to haphazardly throw opposing perspectives at each other for the sake of drama.
Synopsis
This documentary delves into the unanswered questions surrounding the trial of Jessica Wongso — years after the death of her best friend, Mirna Salihin.
Storyline
An exploration of the mysteries surrounding Mirna Salihin's death by alleged poisoning, believed to have been committed by her best friend Jessica Wongso.
TLDR
Twitter, please drink some (non-poisoned) coffee before you get involved in a murder investigation.
What stands out
If Ice Cold could have been reframed from just one primary point of view, it probably would have become most interesting and poignant through Mirna Salihin's father. Driven by unrepentant anger towards Jessica, the man becomes a complex portrait of somebody who undoubtedly loves his daughter but may also be enjoying his 15 minutes of power a little too much. No matter how the film tries to steer away from any real emotion, Edi Salihin shows us how grief can manifest in unexpected ways we rarely see represented on screen. This isn't to say that his bloodlust is morally correct—no one here is completely in the right, after all—but it's genuine all the same.
